This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.0 goals in total (xG 1.6-1.4), keeping it under more often than not (about 84%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.6-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.6-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This should be an open game: we make it around 4.5 goals between the two (xG 2.4-2.1), landing about 68% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 56%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Houston Dynamo are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.7-1.1), and we make them about 56% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.9-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 63%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.4 goals in total (xG 2.3-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 83%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.1), and we make both teams to score about 56%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.1 goals in total (xG 2.0-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 81%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 2.0-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.6 goals in total (xG 2.1-1.5), keeping it under more often than not (about 60%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
New York City are favoured here (xG 1.7-1.2), and draw-no-bet takes the sting out of it: if the game finishes level your stake comes back, so only a New York City defeat beats you.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 57%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Columbus Crew are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-1.0), and we make them about 61% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.9-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 64%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 57%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.9 goals between the two (xG 1.8-2.1), landing about 65% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 57%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.8), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Minnesota United are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-0.9), and we make them about 64% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.2-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.6-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Seattle Sounders are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-1.0), and we make them about 59% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.3 goals in total (xG 1.7-1.6), keeping it under more often than not (about 68%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Vancouver Whitecaps are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.0-1.0), and we make them about 61% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 57%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Charlotte are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-1.1), and we make them about 59% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.5 goals between the two (xG 2.0-1.5), landing about 62% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
Inter Miami are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.7-1.1), and we make them about 70% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.7), and we make both teams to score about 61%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.9-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 61%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.5), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Nashville SC are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-1.0), and we make them about 56% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Vancouver Whitecaps are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.1-1.1), and we make them about 60% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Los Angeles FC are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.2-1.1), and we make them about 63% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
San Diego FC are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-1.2), and we make them about 57% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.