This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.0 goals in total (xG 1.1-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 64%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.0 goals in total (xG 1.2-0.8), keeping it under more often than not (about 63%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.2-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 59%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 1.8 goals in total (xG 0.8-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 63%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This should be an open game: we make it around 1.9 goals between the two (xG 0.9-1.0), landing about 65% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.1 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 60%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 1.9 goals in total (xG 0.9-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 64%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.0 goals in total (xG 1.0-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 62%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Atl. Tucuman are favoured here (xG 0.7-1.0), and draw-no-bet takes the sting out of it: if the game finishes level your stake comes back, so only a Atl. Tucuman defeat beats you.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.0 goals in total (xG 1.1-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 62%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This shapes up as a quiet, low-key game — around 2.4 goals between the two (xG 1.6-0.8). One side keeping it tight for a clean sheet is well on the cards.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 1.9 goals in total (xG 1.0-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 63%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.0-1.2), keeping it under more often than not (about 61%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 1.5 goals in total (xG 0.6-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 69%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.0 goals in total (xG 1.1-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 62%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.1 goals in total (xG 1.3-0.8), keeping it under more often than not (about 61%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.4 goals in total (xG 1.3-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 59%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 1.4 goals in total (xG 0.9-0.6), keeping it under more often than not (about 66%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.3 goals in total (xG 1.2-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 60%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Barracas Central are favoured here (xG 1.3-0.6), and draw-no-bet takes the sting out of it: if the game finishes level your stake comes back, so only a Barracas Central defeat beats you.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.1 goals in total (xG 0.9-1.2), keeping it under more often than not (about 61%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This should be an open game: we make it around 2.4 goals between the two (xG 1.6-0.8), landing about 67% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 1.9 goals in total (xG 1.1-0.8), keeping it under more often than not (about 63%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.1 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 61%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 1.9 goals in total (xG 1.2-0.7), keeping it under more often than not (about 63%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This should be an open game: we make it around 2.0 goals between the two (xG 1.0-1.0), landing about 67% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 1.9 goals in total (xG 0.9-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 63%). Clear chances should be at a premium.