Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 62%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This should be an open game: we make it around 4.3 goals between the two (xG 2.7-1.6), landing about 65% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
Beijing Guoan are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-0.8), and we make them about 65% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.0), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This covers Shenzhen Xinpengcheng or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookShenzhen Xinpengcheng or Draw · 1.16Share
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.8-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 62%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This is about Liaoning Tieren's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 81%.
Top pickLiaoning Tieren to score 1 or fewer · 1.31Share
This is about Qingdao West Coast's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 77%.
Top pickQingdao West Coast to score 1 or fewer · 1.54Share
This should be an open game: we make it around 4.2 goals between the two (xG 2.5-1.6), landing about 65% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 2.0-1.5), and we make both teams to score about 63%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This is about Orenburg's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 77%.
Spartak Moscow are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.6-0.9), and we make them about 76% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Zenit are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-0.5), and we make them about 77% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This shapes up as a quiet, low-key game — around 2.0 goals between the two (xG 1.3-0.7). One side keeping it tight for a clean sheet is well on the cards.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.2 goals between the two (xG 1.2-1.9), landing about 67% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.6-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 64%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This is about Groningen's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.1 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 71%.
PSV Eindhoven shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.1-2.8), and we make them about 76% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.5), and we make both teams to score about 65%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 61%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.6-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.8-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Villarreal are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.7-0.8), and we make them about 62% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.8), and we make both teams to score about 66%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This is about Altach's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 73%.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 57%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 61%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.9-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.2-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.8), and we make both teams to score about 61%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 57%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.1-1.5), and we make both teams to score about 56%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 56%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.8), and we make both teams to score about 61%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.8-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 63%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This is about FC Voluntari's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 0.9 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 78%.
Top pickFC Voluntari to score 1 or fewer · 1.34Share
This covers Univ. Craiova or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.9), and we make both teams to score about 63%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Freiburg are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.7-1.1), and we make them about 59% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Hoffenheim are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-1.0), and we make them about 59% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
AEK are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.6-0.6), and we make them about 83% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This is about Kalamata's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.7 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 83%.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.1 goals in total (xG 0.9-1.2), keeping it under more often than not (about 78%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This should be an open game: we make it around 2.9 goals between the two (xG 1.6-1.3), landing about 77% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This should be an open game: we make it around 2.9 goals between the two (xG 1.9-1.1), landing about 58% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.9 goals between the two (xG 3.2-0.7), landing about 79% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This covers Audax Italiano or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This covers Unión La Calera or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Universidad Católica are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.1-1.2), and we make them about 57% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Match outlookUniversidad Católica to win · 1.61Share
This covers Sheffield Weds or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookSheffield Weds or Draw · 1.55 est.Share