This is about Juarez's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.1 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 77%.
This covers Nagoya Grampus or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.8-1.1), and we make both teams to score about 57%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Galatasaray are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.9-0.7), and we make them about 84% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This should be an open game: we make it around 2.9 goals between the two (xG 1.7-1.2), landing about 56% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This covers Dynamo Moscow or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Akhmat Grozny are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.1-1.1), and we make them about 59% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This should be an open game: we make it around 2.8 goals between the two (xG 1.9-0.9), landing about 79% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This covers Korona Kielce or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This covers Slask Wroclaw or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This is about Wieczysta Krakow's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.1 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 74%.
Top pickWieczysta Krakow to score 1 or fewer · 1.33Share
This covers Pogon Szczecin or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This covers Botev Vratsa or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This covers Slavia Sofia or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Ludogorets Razgrad are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-0.9), and we make them about 59% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Match outlookLudogorets Razgrad to win · 1.59Share
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Arsenal are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-0.6), and we make them about 69% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Man City shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.1-1.7), and we make them about 59% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
This covers Bristol City or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This is about Portsmouth's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.3 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 77%.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 2.0-1.5), and we make both teams to score about 63%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This covers Sheffield United or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This is about Lincoln's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 75%.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.2-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 81%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.8), and we make both teams to score about 66%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Real Madrid shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.0-1.9), and we make them about 67% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
This is about Pau FC's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.6 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 76%.
St Etienne are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.1-1.1), and we make them about 65% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
U. Cluj shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.0-1.8), and we make them about 58% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
This covers FC Rapid Bucuresti or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookFC Rapid Bucuresti or Draw · 1.28Share
FCSB are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-0.9), and we make them about 60% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Al Hilal shade this one on the numbers (xG 0.9-2.3), and we make them about 68% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Al Ahli are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-0.9), and we make them about 65% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Juve Stabia are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-0.9), and we make them about 57% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Pisa are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-1.0), and we make them about 60% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.4-0.8), keeping it under more often than not (about 81%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Dortmund are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.3-1.1), and we make them about 71% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Bayern Munich shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.2-2.6), and we make them about 77% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.5), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.5 goals between the two (xG 2.3-1.2), landing about 69% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.5 goals between the two (xG 2.3-1.3), landing about 67% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
Slovan Bratislava are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.6-0.8), and we make them about 80% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This covers SPG HOGO Wels or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
BW Linz are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-0.8), and we make them about 65% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 56%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Rangers shade this one on the numbers (xG 0.9-2.0), and we make them about 61% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Barnet are favoured here (xG 2.5-1.1), and draw-no-bet takes the sting out of it: if the game finishes level your stake comes back, so only a Barnet defeat beats you.
Barnsley are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.5-1.1), and we make them about 71% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This covers Boreham Wood or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookBoreham Wood or Draw · 1.26 est.Share
This is about Rotherham's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.1 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 76%.
Chesterfield are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.1-1.1), and we make them about 60% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This is about Crewe's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.5 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 74%.
This covers Fleetwood Town or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Huddersfield are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-0.9), and we make them about 63% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.1 goals in total (xG 0.9-1.2), keeping it under more often than not (about 77%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Luton are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.5-1.0), and we make them about 75% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Mansfield are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-1.2), and we make them about 67% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Milton Keynes Dons are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.0-1.2), and we make them about 57% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Match outlookMilton Keynes Dons to win · 1.58Share
Port Vale are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.5-1.0), and we make them about 56% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
York are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.1-0.8), and we make them about 68% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This covers Notts County or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookNotts County or Draw · 1.29 est.Share
Glentoran shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.1-1.9), and we make them about 59% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
This covers Dungannon Swifts or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.8), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Rosenborg are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.9-0.9), and we make them about 78% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 55%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Aris are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.7-0.8), and we make them about 62% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.6-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 63%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This covers Oud-Heverlee Leuven or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookOud-Heverlee Leuven or Draw · 1.38Share
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.5), and we make both teams to score about 62%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 61%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 62%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 63%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This covers Khor Fakkan Club or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Shabab Al-Ahli Dubai FC shade this one on the numbers (xG 0.7-2.7), and we make them about 78% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Match outlookShabab Al-Ahli Dubai FC to win · 2.15Share
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Sp Lisbon are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.4-0.7), and we make them about 81% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This covers MTK Budapest or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This is about A. Lustenau's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.6 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 76%.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.8), and we make both teams to score about 61%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This covers Hapoel Haifa or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This covers Hapoel Jerusalem FC or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookHapoel Jerusalem FC or Draw · 1.32Share
Beitar Jerusalem shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.1-1.8), and we make them about 57% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Paris SG are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 3.0-0.7), and we make them about 90% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.5), and we make both teams to score about 57%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.6-1.9), and we make both teams to score about 64%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.2-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 56%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.