This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.4 goals in total (xG 1.5-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 59%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.7 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.6), keeping it under more often than not (about 57%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.5 goals in total (xG 1.5-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 78%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.9 goals in total (xG 1.7-1.3), keeping it under more often than not (about 54%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.6 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.5), keeping it under more often than not (about 53%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.6 goals in total (xG 1.2-1.4), keeping it under more often than not (about 80%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.3-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 58%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.7 goals in total (xG 1.7-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 56%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.7 goals in total (xG 1.8-0.8), keeping it under more often than not (about 79%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.4 goals in total (xG 1.3-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 59%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.5 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.4), keeping it under more often than not (about 54%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.5 goals in total (xG 1.4-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 78%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Palmeiras are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.4-0.7), and we make them about 77% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.3 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 62%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.7 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.5), keeping it under more often than not (about 57%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 53%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 59%). Clear chances should be at a premium.