Free Football Predictions Today, Sun 16 Aug | Slip Arena
Free tips
50Competitions
32Countries
Our modelEvery pick
FreeEvery day
69Matches
23Leagues
19Top picks
Next kickoff
Featured matchAllsvenskan ·
Degerfors v Goteborg
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.7 goals in total (xG 1.3-1.4), keeping it under more often than not (about 74%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
First Vienna FC are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.5-1.4), and we make them about 37% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
18+Bet responsiblyOver 18s only. Predictions are opinions, never guarantees, and betting is not a way to make money. Only stake what you can afford to lose, and if it stops being fun, get help.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.2-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 55%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.1 goals between the two (xG 1.5-1.6), landing about 59% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
Zenit are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.0-0.8), and we make them about 69% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 2.2-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.2 goals in total (xG 2.1-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 85%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.8 goals in total (xG 1.9-1.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 78%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Southampton shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.1-1.9), and we make them about 58% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.1 goals in total (xG 1.5-1.6), keeping it under more often than not (about 70%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.5 goals in total (xG 2.5-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 86%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.3 goals in total (xG 1.2-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 79%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.7 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.6), keeping it under more often than not (about 57%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Operario Ferroviario are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.3-1.0), and we make them about 46% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.3 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.2), keeping it under more often than not (about 56%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This should be an open game: we make it around 2.5 goals between the two (xG 1.4-1.1), landing about 76% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.6 goals in total (xG 1.2-1.4), keeping it under more often than not (about 54%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.6-0.6), keeping it under more often than not (about 78%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This should be an open game: we make it around 1.9 goals between the two (xG 0.9-1.0), landing about 65% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
UNAM Pumas are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-0.9), and we make them about 61% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.7 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.6), keeping it under more often than not (about 70%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Deportivo Táchira are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-0.8), and we make them about 67% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.6 goals in total (xG 2.1-1.5), keeping it under more often than not (about 60%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Young Ghanaian forward Emmanuel Quarshie scored his first-ever goal for Radnik Surdulica on Saturday, helping his side secure their maiden victory of the 2026-27 Serbian Super…
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.3 goals in total (xG 2.2-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 76%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.3 goals in total (xG 2.4-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 77%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.0 goals in total (xG 2.0-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 80%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.4 goals in total (xG 1.2-1.3), keeping it under more often than not (about 71%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.4 goals in total (xG 1.2-1.2), keeping it under more often than not (about 72%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.4 goals in total (xG 1.3-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 72%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.3 goals in total (xG 1.2-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 58%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.7 goals in total (xG 1.3-1.4), keeping it under more often than not (about 74%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.6 goals in total (xG 1.4-1.2), keeping it under more often than not (about 74%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Hammarby shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.0-1.8), and we make them about 58% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.5 goals in total (xG 1.4-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 53%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Midtjylland shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.1-2.2), and we make them about 61% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.2-1.9), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 3.5 goals in total (xG 2.2-1.2), keeping it under more often than not (about 80%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Sarpsborg 08 are favoured here (xG 1.5-1.0), and draw-no-bet takes the sting out of it: if the game finishes level your stake comes back, so only a Sarpsborg 08 defeat beats you.
This is our most likely exact scoreline for the game (xG 1.6-0.9). Correct score is a long shot by nature, so treat it as a small-stakes punt rather than a banker.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.1-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 56%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Gornik Zabrze are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.2-1.3), and we make them about 58% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.1 goals in total (xG 0.9-1.3), keeping it under more often than not (about 57%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.0 goals in total (xG 0.9-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 75%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.5 goals in total (xG 1.5-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 78%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.9 goals in total (xG 1.7-1.3), keeping it under more often than not (about 54%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.6 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.5), keeping it under more often than not (about 53%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.6 goals in total (xG 1.2-1.4), keeping it under more often than not (about 80%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.3-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 58%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
America MG are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.2-1.0), and we make them about 40% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
América MG are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.5-0.8), and we make them about 75% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
CRB are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.2-1.1), and we make them about 36% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.1), and we make both teams to score about 59%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.0 goals in total (xG 1.2-0.8), keeping it under more often than not (about 60%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Sp Braga are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-1.0), and we make them about 61% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.0-1.2), keeping it under more often than not (about 62%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Slavia Prague are favoured here (xG 0.9-1.7), and draw-no-bet takes the sting out of it: if the game finishes level your stake comes back, so only a Slavia Prague defeat beats you.
Slavia Praha shade this one on the numbers (xG 0.8-1.8), and we make them about 62% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Salzburg shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.2-1.8), and we make them about 58% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-1.1), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.1), keeping it under more often than not (about 59%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This is our most likely exact scoreline for the game (xG 1.8-0.9). Correct score is a long shot by nature, so treat it as a small-stakes punt rather than a banker.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.1 goals in total (xG 1.1-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 60%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 1.9 goals in total (xG 0.9-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 64%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.0 goals in total (xG 1.0-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 62%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Club America are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.0-0.9), and we make them about 62% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Deportivo La Guaira are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.4-0.6), and we make them about 60% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.3 goals in total (xG 1.5-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 56%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
New York City are favoured here (xG 1.7-1.2), and draw-no-bet takes the sting out of it: if the game finishes level your stake comes back, so only a New York City defeat beats you.
v
★★★★★
v
★★★★★
v
★★★★★
v
★★★★★
v
★★★★★
