Cavalry FC are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.4-0.8), and we make them about 75% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This is about Santos Laguna's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.1 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 71%.
Top pickSantos Laguna to score 1 or fewer · 1.75Share
This is about Tigres UANL's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 76%.
Top pickTigres UANL to score 1 or fewer · 1.36Share
This covers Ordabasy Shymkent or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookOrdabasy Shymkent or Draw · 1.30Share
Shakhtar Donetsk are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-0.6), and we make them about 70% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Fenerbahce are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.3-0.9), and we make them about 71% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.1 goals in total (xG 1.5-0.6), keeping it under more often than not (about 78%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.8), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This covers FK TransINVEST or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 62%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.3-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 55%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 63%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This is about Woking's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.3 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 77%.
Carlisle are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.5-1.4), and we make them about 63% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This is about Solihull's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 77%.
This does not need a goal rush: we make it around 2.6 goals (xG 1.5-1.1), and two is enough to land it, landing about 76% of the time on these numbers.
Torquay are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-1.3), and we make them about 57% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Worthing shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.6-2.3), and we make them about 62% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
This does not need a goal rush: we make it around 2.6 goals (xG 1.5-1.1), and two is enough to land it, landing about 74% of the time on these numbers.
This is about Exeter's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.1 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 72%.
This is about Rochdale's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 75%.
Grimsby are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.6-0.9), and we make them about 60% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This is about Cheltenham's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 0.9 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 76%.
Top pickCheltenham to score 1 or fewer · 1.31Share
This covers Chesterfield or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This is about Crawley Town's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 79%.
Top pickCrawley Town to score 1 or fewer · 1.27Share
Barnet shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.3-1.6), and we make them about 56% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
This covers Bristol City or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This is about Derby's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.3 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 74%.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.5 goals between the two (xG 2.2-1.2), landing about 63% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.1 goals in total (xG 1.2-0.9), keeping it under more often than not (about 83%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 57%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This shapes up as a quiet, low-key game — around 1.8 goals between the two (xG 1.0-0.8). One side keeping it tight for a clean sheet is well on the cards.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.5-1.2), and we make both teams to score about 55%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This is about Blackpool's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.3 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 74%.
This is about AFC Wimbledon's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 0.7 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 86%.
Top pickAFC Wimbledon to score 1 or fewer · 1.33Share
Our model makes this about 80% for the home side. The match odds favour the away side, which tends to shift the corner count their way. Corners are a new market for us — the record is public from day one.
Top pickWigan Athletic under 6.5 corners · 1.31Share
This is about Wigan's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.1 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 70%.
This is about Notts County's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 73%.
Top pickNotts County to score 1 or fewer · 1.38Share
Villarreal are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.1-1.1), and we make them about 63% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.4-2.1), and we make both teams to score about 65%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.8-1.6), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Viking are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.4-0.8), and we make them about 73% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This is about Red Star's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.3 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 71%.
This covers Puskás FC Academy or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookPuskás FC Academy or Draw · 1.58Share
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.6-1.3), and we make both teams to score about 58%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This does not need a goal rush: we make it around 2.5 goals (xG 1.2-1.3), and two is enough to land it, landing about 74% of the time on these numbers.
Inter shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.1-1.6), and we make them about 56% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Roma are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-0.8), and we make them about 69% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This is about Slovan Liberec's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.2 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 66%.
Top pickSlovan Liberec to score 1 or fewer · 1.53Share
This covers Boston River or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Vojvodina are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-1.0), and we make them about 60% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.0 goals in total (xG 1.2-0.8), keeping it under more often than not (about 81%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This is about FC Rapid Bucuresti's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.3 on the day, and the bet wants them to 2 or fewer, which we make about 81%.
Top pickFC Rapid Bucuresti to score 2 or fewer · 1.32Share
This covers Shabab Al-Ahli Dubai FC or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookShabab Al-Ahli Dubai FC or Draw · 1.62Share
Bayern Munich are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.8-1.2), and we make them about 75% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Sekhukhune United are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.5-0.7), and we make them about 58% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
BW Linz are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.4-1.1), and we make them about 68% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This covers Spartak Trnava or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This has the look of a cagey, low-scoring game — around 2.2 goals in total (xG 1.2-1.0), keeping it under more often than not (about 80%). Clear chances should be at a premium.
This is about Hibernian's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.8 on the day, and the bet wants them to 2 or fewer, which we make about 75%.
This is about Kilmarnock's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.3 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 72%.
This covers St Johnstone or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.3 goals between the two (xG 1.1-2.3), landing about 69% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This covers Ballymena United or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This covers Dungannon Swifts or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Linfield shade this one on the numbers (xG 0.9-1.8), and we make them about 61% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
Glentoran are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.0-0.8), and we make them about 70% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Cliftonville are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-0.9), and we make them about 60% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This is about Volos NFC's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 78%.
Feyenoord shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.1-2.3), and we make them about 69% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
This is about Willem II's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 0.9 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 79%.
This covers Al Quwa Al Jawiya or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookAl Quwa Al Jawiya or Draw · 1.44Share
LASK shade this one on the numbers (xG 1.3-2.2), and we make them about 63% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
This is about Austria Vienna's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.2 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 73%.
This covers Krasava Ypsonas FC or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookKrasava Ypsonas FC or Draw · 1.34Share
Apollon Limassol are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.1-0.9), and we make them about 70% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.4 goals between the two (xG 1.3-2.1), landing about 61% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
Lille are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.8-1.0), and we make them about 56% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Lens are favoured here (xG 1.0-2.0), and draw-no-bet takes the sting out of it: if the game finishes level your stake comes back, so only a Lens defeat beats you.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.4), and we make both teams to score about 60%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Hapoel Tel Aviv are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.7-0.9), and we make them about 58% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This covers Hapoel Haifa or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This covers Hapoel Petah Tikva or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookHapoel Petah Tikva or Draw · 1.45Share
This covers Maccabi Netanya or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Maccabi Haifa shade this one on the numbers (xG 0.9-2.3), and we make them about 65% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.
CS Constantine are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.1-1.1), and we make them about 60% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
MC Oran are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.4-0.8), and we make them about 56% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This covers Independiente del Valle or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookIndependiente del Valle or Draw · 1.30Share
This covers LDU de Quito or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This shapes up as a quiet, low-key game — around 2.0 goals between the two (xG 0.9-1.1). One side keeping it tight for a clean sheet is well on the cards.
This covers Ind. Rivadavia or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This is about Rosario Central's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.1 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 73%.
This shapes up as a quiet, low-key game — around 2.2 goals between the two (xG 1.4-0.8). One side keeping it tight for a clean sheet is well on the cards.
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.4 goals between the two (xG 2.0-1.4), landing about 64% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.8), and we make both teams to score about 65%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.6-2.0), and we make both teams to score about 62%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
Both of these carry enough of a threat to find the net (xG 1.7-1.5), and we make both teams to score about 61%. Expect goals at either end rather than a one-sided shut-out.
This is about Los Angeles FC's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.2 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 67%.
Top pickLos Angeles FC to score 1 or fewer · 1.70Share
This is about Toronto FC's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.3 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 66%.
Top pickToronto FC to score 1 or fewer · 1.68Share
This should be an open game: we make it around 3.7 goals between the two (xG 2.2-1.5), landing about 63% of the time on these numbers. Both sides carry a threat, so the goals should follow.
This is about Sligo Rovers's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.2 on the day, and the bet needs them to find the net, which we make about 71%.
This covers CDT Real Oruro or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
This covers Universitario de Vinto or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookUniversitario de Vinto or Draw · 1.18Share
Blooming are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 1.9-1.1), and we make them about 60% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This covers ADC Juan Pablo II or the draw, trading a shorter price for a wider safety net. A sensible way to back the lean without needing the exact result.
Match outlookADC Juan Pablo II or Draw · 1.32Share
Deportivo La Guaira are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.1-0.6), and we make them about 77% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
This is about Deportivo Táchira's goals alone, not the game's total. We make them around 1.0 on the day, and the bet wants them to 1 or fewer, which we make about 73%.
Top pickDeportivo Táchira to score 1 or fewer · 1.38Share
Botafogo RJ are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.4-0.8), and we make them about 75% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Atletico-MG are the stronger side on the numbers (xG 2.0-0.9), and we make them about 66% to win. On this shape, taking them to come out on top looks the cleaner play than chasing a bigger price elsewhere.
Palmeiras shade this one on the numbers (xG 0.7-1.7), and we make them about 59% to win. They look the better bet on the road, and backing them outright is the straightforward way in.